Sunday, May 6, 2018
Climate change is one field that needs more attention, and we should look to technology to solve legitimate challenges.
Some of the world’s brightest minds are advancing this idea. The head of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Energy Institute recently wrote, “Technology and innovation, rather than sweeping federal mandates, offer the best approach for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating the impacts of climate change.”
Microsoft founder Bill Gates and other high-tech giants have put up $1 billion to find technology-related solutions. The group in 2016 launched Breakthrough Energy Ventures to fund research into emerging energy and climate technologies. This is exactly the kind of innovative endeavor we should encourage and support.
Unfortunately, climate alarmism runs rampant among the liberal media and those who want more government regulations. Surprisingly, many climate scientists ignore the scientific method, which welcomes critiques, avoids exaggerated predictions, and relies on unbiased data. Climate alarmists violate each of these tenets.
Alarmists also take aim at the second tenet of the scientific method, avoiding exaggerated predictions.
Wild predictions undermine confidence in the entire field of science. When they are relied on to make far-reaching policy decisions, they do a disservice to the people impacted. Former Vice President Al Gore said in 2006, “Unless drastic measures to reduce greenhouse gases are taken within the next 10 years, the world will reach a point of no return.” This prediction clearly has not come true.
It’s suspicious that data adjustments almost always seem to go in one direction, which is toward greater climate change. And the thought of anyone accurately predicting the climate landscape for 50 or 500 years from now is laughable. Furthermore, those predictions don’t take natural variability or undiscovered innovations into account.
Alarmists also rely on biased data and present the American people with politically charged “scientific conclusions,” violating the third principle of the scientific method. For example, according to Google Scholar, there are 20,000 studies that use the worst case climate scenario to depict what the future climate will be even though, according to a 2017 study, the worst case scenario is “exceptionally unlikely.”
Climate alarmists will continue to promote inflated, sometimes completely incorrect, claims. But the American people will see through the bluster. We should focus on the only proven way to overcome the biggest challenges our country has faced: technology and innovation.
The United States has fostered some of the greatest scientific advancements in history. These discoveries were not the result of a punitive government tax, fee or regulation. Rather, they were made possible by America’s scientists who will continue to advance groundbreaking new technologies to address climate change as they have done for every other challenge before now.
Technology should lead the way. The future lies with research and development and an appreciation for the inevitable solutions yet to come.
Rep. Lamar Smith represents the 21st District of Texas and serves as the Chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Leave a Reply